SC/ST PROMOTION - SUPREME COURT VERDICT

WHAT RECENTLY HAPPENED?

A constitutional bench of supreme court made rules very easy for SC/ST so that they can get promotion very easily in Government jobs.

Here, Supreme court modified 2006 M.Nagaraj Judgment.
Image result for SC/ST Promotion Supreme Court Verdict

FROM WHERE ALL THIS STARTS ?

In 1992, Supreme court gave judgement on case called 'Indra Sawhney & Others  Vs. Union of India case' OR 'Mandal case'  [ OBC RESERVATION]

In this, Supreme court told there is no need to creamy layer test for SC/ST. They will get quota/reservation in government jobs. That was Good News for SC/ST and SC/ST welcome this scheme.

Like, In OBC Reservation, if a person is in a Creamy Layer - He/she will not get any reservation. But in SC/ST - If a person is in Creamy Layer - Still he/she get reservation (as per 1992 SC Judgement)

Also, In 1992, SC told, There is no need of Reservation in Promotion for SC/ST

As Since, 1950 SC/ST enjoying the facility of reservation in appointment and promotion in Government jobs.

REASON GIVEN BY SC - FOR STRIKING DOWN THE RESERVATION IN PROMOTION IN 1992
 
The reasoning was that Reservation exist to create a level-playing field, to remedy unequal starting positions, Thereby removing the justification for promotion quotas

The court used the light of Article 335 to justify this.

So, after this verdict in 1992, so many SC/ST leaders protests. And government came in action.

The government further opined that reservation of the SC's and ST's in the services in the state have not reached the required level.

And Thus, Government Passed article 16(4A) to the constitution. in 1995

So Basically Article 16(4A) overruled the 1992 Supreme court judgement

So again in 1995, SC/ST get facility of reservation in promotion as well.

In 2006 - M Nagaraj Case came -and which challenged 16(4A) by considering the validity of 77th amendment.

Thenagain in 2006 Supreme court put some provisions for SC/ST if they want to avail the facility of reservation in Promotion.

Here, Supreme court added that - If any state wants to give reservation in Promotion to SC/ST They need to follow below criteria :-

1) The state would have to demonstrate the backwardness.[[i.e. prove with data]
2) Inadequacy of representation. 
3) Maintenance of efficiency. [make sure efficiency of administrator not decrease as we are not giving promotion to merit students]

PRESENT JUDGEMENT IN 2018

There was a case going on [Jarnail Singh V/s Lachhmi Narain Gupta]  - Basically a plea to revisit the N.Nagaraj case of 2006.

Center Government also in favour of this.

VERDICT 2018

So, in 2018  SC removed two conditions out three which SC put in 2006 case.

Below two conditions removed in 2018 verdict :-

1) States were not required to collect quantifiable data
2) And No need to study efficiency of administrator whether it will put any impact of administrator efficiency, There is no need to study.

But third condition is still same i.e inadequate representation in higher cadre (which the can easily prove)

Also, SC told that Quota in Promotion is Okay, But Remove the creamy layer of SC/ST in reservation in Promotion.

For more information, you can access below links:

https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/supreme-court-reservation-job-promotions-1349478-2018-09-26

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/supreme-court-refuses-to-refer-to-7-judge-bench-its-2006-verdict-on-sc/st-job-promotion/articleshow/65960548.cms

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/sc/st-job-promotion-quota-supreme-court-says-no-need-to-collect-data/articleshow/65960334.cms

Above Information is as per data available in news till the date when I am posting this. For Other Topics visit - http://learn2ogether.blogspot.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CHINA , US - HACKING ISSUE - CAN WE TRUST BLOOMBERG'S REPORT ?

BCCI UNDER RTI - IS IT THE RIGHT THING TO DO?

WHAT IS PROJECT DRAGON FLY ? WHY GOOGLE WANT TO START DRAGONFLY PROJECT IN CHINA ?